Bird migration

A flock of Barnacle Geese during autumn migration

Contents

Bird migration is the regular seasonal journey undertaken by many species of birds. Bird movements include those made in response to changes in food availability, habitat or weather. These however are usually irregular or in only one direction and are termed variously as nomadism, invasions, dispersal or irruptions. Migration is marked by its annual seasonality.[1] In contrast, birds that are non-migratory are said to be resident or sedentary. Approximately 1800 of world's 10,000 bird species are long-distance migrants [2]

General patterns

Some migration routes

Many bird populations migrate long distances along a flyway. The most common pattern involves flying north in the spring to breed in the temperate or Arctic summer and returning in the fall to wintering grounds in warmer regions to the south.

The primary advantage of migration is conservation of energy. The longer days of the northern summer provide greater opportunities for breeding birds to feed their young. The extended daylight hours allow diurnal birds to produce larger clutches than those of related non-migratory species that remain in the tropics year round. As the days shorten in autumn, the birds return to warmer regions where the available food supply varies little with the season.

These advantages offset the high stress, physical exertion costs, and other risks of the migration. Predation can be heightened during migration. The Eleonora's Falcon, which breeds on Mediterranean islands, has a very late breeding season, coordinated with the autumn passage of southbound passerine migrants, which it feeds to its young. A similar strategy is adopted by the Greater Noctule bat, which preys on nocturnal passerine migrants.[3][4][5] The higher concentrations of migrating birds at stopover sites make them prone to parasites and pathogens, which require a heightened immune response.[6]

Within a species not all populations may be migratory; this is known as "partial migration". Partial migration is very common in the southern continents; in Australia, 44% of non-passerine birds and 32% of passerine species are partially migratory.[7] In some species, the population at higher latitudes tends to be migratory and will often winter at lower latitude. The migrating birds bypass the latitudes where other populations may be sedentary, where suitable wintering habitats may already be occupied. This is known as leap-frog migration.[8] Within a population, there can also be different patterns of timing and migration based on the age groups and sex. Only the female Chaffinches in Scandinavia migrate, with the males staying resident. This has given rise to the latter's specific name of coelebs, a bachelor.

Most migrations begin with the birds starting off in a broad front. In some cases the migration may involve narrow belts of migration that are established as traditional routes termed flyways. These routes typically follow mountain ranges or coastlines, and may take advantage of updrafts and other wind patterns or avoid geographical barriers such as large stretches of open water. The specific routes may be genetically programmed or learned to varying degrees. The routes taken on forward and return migration are often different.[6]

Many of the larger birds fly in flocks. Flying in flocks helps in reducing the energy needed. Many large birds fly in a V-formation, which helps individuals save 12–20 % of the energy they would need to fly alone.[9][10] Red Knots Calidris canutus and Dunlins Calidris alpina were found in radar studies to fly 5 km per hour faster in flocks than when they were flying alone.[6]

Birds fly at varying altitudes during migration. An expedition to Mt. Everest found skeletons of Pintail and Black-tailed Godwit at 5000 m (16,400 ft) on the Khumbu Glacier.[11] Bar-headed Geese have been seen flying over the highest peaks of the Himalayas above 8000 m (29000 ft) even when low passes of 3000 m (10000 ft) were nearby.[12] Seabirds fly low over water but gain altitude when crossing land, and the reverse pattern is seen in landbirds.[13][14] However most bird migration is in the range of 150 m (500 ft) to 600 m (2000 ft). Bird-hit aviation records from the United States show most collisions occur below 600 m (2000 ft) and almost none above 1800 m (6000 ft).[15]

In contrast, most species of penguin migrate by swimming. These routes can cover over 1000 km. Blue Grouse Dendragapus obscurus perform altitudinal migration mostly by walking. Emus in Australia have been observed to undertake long-distance movements on foot during droughts.[6]

Historical views

The earliest recorded observations of bird migration were 3000 years ago, as noted by Hesiod, Homer, Herodotus, Aristotle and others. The Bible also notes migrations, as in the Book of Job (39:26), where the inquiry is made: "Doth the hawk fly by Thy wisdom and stretch her wings toward the south?" The author of Jeremiah (8:7) wrote: "The stork in the heavens knoweth her appointed time; and the turtledove, and the crane, and the swallow, observe the time of their coming."

Aristotle noted that cranes traveled from the steppes of Scythia to marshes at the headwaters of the Nile. Pliny the Elder, in his Historia Naturalis, repeats Aristotle's observations. Aristotle however suggested that swallows and other birds hibernated. This belief persisted as late as 1878, when Elliott Coues listed the titles of no less than 182 papers dealing with the hibernation of swallows. It was not until early in the nineteenth century that migration as an explanation for the winter disappearance of birds from northern climes was accepted.[16]

The discovery in Germany of white storks embedded with African arrows provided early clues on migration. One of the oldest of these Pfeilstorch specimens was found in 1822 near the German village of Klütz, in the state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.

Long-distance migration

Swainson's Thrush

The typical image of migration is of northern landbirds, such as swallows and birds of prey, making long flights to the tropics. Many northern-breeding ducks, geese and swans are also long-distance migrants, but need only to move from their Arctic breeding grounds far enough south to escape frozen waters. Most Holarctic wildfowl species remain in the Northern Hemisphere, but in countries with milder climates. For example, the pink-footed goose migrates from Iceland to Britain and neighbouring countries. Migratory routes and wintering grounds are traditional and learned by young during their first migration with their parents. Some ducks, such as the Garganey, move completely or partially into the tropics.

The same considerations about barriers and detours that apply to long-distance land-bird migration apply to water birds, but in reverse: a large area of land without bodies of water that offer feeding sites is a barrier to a water bird. Open sea may also be a barrier to a bird that feeds in coastal waters. Detours avoiding such barriers are observed: for example, Brent Geese migrating from the Taymyr Peninsula to the Wadden Sea travel via the White Sea coast and the Baltic Sea rather than directly across the Arctic Ocean and northern Scandinavia.

Bar-tailed Godwit

A similar situation occurs with waders (called "shorebirds" in North America). Many species, such as Dunlin and Western Sandpiper, undertake long movements from their Arctic breeding grounds to warmer locations in the same hemisphere, but others such as Semipalmated Sandpiper travel longer distances to the tropics in the Southern Hemisphere. Like the large and powerful wildfowl, the waders are strong fliers. This means that birds wintering in temperate regions have the capacity to make further shorter movements in the event of particularly inclement weather.

For some species of waders, migration success depends on the availability of certain key food resources at stopover points along the migration route. This gives the migrants an opportunity to "refuel" for the next leg of the voyage. Some examples of important stopover locations are the Bay of Fundy and Delaware Bay.

Some Bar-tailed Godwits have the longest known non-stop flight of any migrant, flying 11,000 km from Alaska to their New Zealand non-breeding areas.[17] Prior to migration, 55 percent of their bodyweight is stored fat to fuel this uninterrupted journey.

Seabird migration is similar in pattern to those of the waders and waterfowl. Some, such as the Black Guillemot and some gulls, are quite sedentary; others, such as most terns and auks breeding in the temperate northern hemisphere, move varying distances south in winter. The Arctic Tern has the longest-distance migration of any bird, and sees more daylight than any other, moving from its Arctic breeding grounds to the Antarctic non-breeding areas. One Arctic Tern, ringed (banded) as a chick on the Farne Islands off the British east coast, reached Melbourne, Australia in just three months from fledging, a sea journey of over 22,000 km (14,000 miles). A few seabirds, such as Wilson's Petrel and Great Shearwater, breed in the southern hemisphere and migrate north in the southern winter. Seabirds have the additional advantage of being able to feed during migration over open waters.

The most pelagic species, mainly in the 'tubenose' order Procellariiformes, are great wanderers, and the albatrosses of the southern oceans may circle the globe as they ride the "roaring forties" outside the breeding season. The tubenoses spread widely over large areas of open ocean, but congregate when food becomes available. Many are also among the longest-distance migrants; Sooty Shearwaters nesting on the Falkland Islands migrate 14,000 km (9,000 miles) between the breeding colony and the North Atlantic Ocean off Norway. Some Manx Shearwaters do this same journey in reverse. As they are long-lived birds, they may cover enormous distances during their lives; one record-breaking Manx Shearwater is calculated to have flown 8 million km (5 million miles) during its over-50 year lifespan.

Griffon Vulture soaring

Some large broad-winged birds rely on thermal columns of rising hot air to enable them to soar. These include many birds of prey such as vultures, eagles, and buzzards, but also storks. These birds migrate in the daytime. Migratory species in these groups have great difficulty crossing large bodies of water, since thermals only form over land, and these birds cannot maintain active flight for long distances. The Mediterranean and other seas present a major obstacle to soaring birds, which must cross at the narrowest points. Massive numbers of large raptors and storks pass through areas such as Gibraltar, Falsterbo, and the Bosphorus at migration times. More common species, such as the Honey Buzzard, can be counted in hundreds of thousands in autumn. Other barriers, such as mountain ranges, can also cause funnelling, particularly of large diurnal migrants. This is a notable factor in the Central American migratory bottleneck.

Ruby-throated Hummingbird

Many of the smaller insectivorous birds including the warblers, hummingbirds and flycatchers migrate large distances, usually at night. They land in the morning and may feed for a few days before resuming their migration. The birds are referred to as passage migrants in the regions where they occur for short durations between the origin and destination.[18]

Nocturnal migrants minimize predation, avoid overheating, and feed during the day.[16] One cost of nocturnal migration is the loss of sleep. Migrants may be able to alter their quality of sleep to compensate for the loss.[19]

Short-distance migration

Cedar Waxwing

Many of the long-distance migrants in the previous section are effectively genetically programmed to respond to changing lengths of days. However, many species move shorter distances, but may do so only in response to harsh weather conditions.

Thus mountain and moorland breeders, such as Wallcreeper and White-throated Dipper, may move only altitudinally to escape the cold higher ground. Other species such as Merlin and Skylark will move further to the coast or to a more southerly region. Species like the Chaffinch are not migratory in Britain, but will move south or to Ireland in very cold weather.

Short-distance passerine migrants have two evolutionary origins. Those that have long-distance migrants in the same family, such as the Chiffchaff, are species of southern hemisphere origins that have progressively shortened their return migration to stay in the northern hemisphere.

Species that have no long-distance migratory relatives, such as the waxwings, are effectively moving in response to winter weather, rather than enhanced breeding opportunities.

Woodland Kingfisher

In the tropics there is little variation in the length of day throughout the year, and it is always warm enough for an adequate food supply. Apart from the seasonal movements of northern hemisphere wintering species, most species are in the broadest sense resident. However many species undergo movements of varying distances depending on the rainfall.

Many tropical regions have wet and dry seasons, the monsoons of India are preceded by the arrival of the Jacobin Cuckoo, the "harbinger of the monsoon". Another example of a bird whose distribution is rain associated is the Woodland Kingfisher of west Africa.

There are a few species, notably cuckoos, which are genuine long-distance migrants within the tropics. An example is the Lesser Cuckoo, which breeds in India and spends the non-breeding season in Africa.

In the high mountains, such as the Himalayas and the Andes, there are also seasonal altitudinal movements in many species, and others may undertake migrations of considerable length. The Himalayan Kashmir Flycatcher and Pied Thrush both move as far south as the highlands of Sri Lanka.

Irruptions and dispersal

Sometimes circumstances such as a good breeding season followed by a food source failure the following year lead to irruptions in which large numbers of a species move far beyond the normal range. Bohemian Waxwing and Common Crossbills show this unpredictable variation in annual numbers.

The temperate zones of the southern continents have extensive arid areas, particularly in Australia and western southern Africa, and weather-driven movements are common but not always predictable. A couple of weeks of heavy rain in one part or another of the usually dry centre of Australia, for example, causes dramatic plant and invertebrate growth, attracting birds from all directions. This can happen at any time of year, and, in any given area, may not happen again for a decade or more, depending on the frequency of El Niño and La Niña periods.

Rainbow Bee-eater

Bird migration is primarily, but not entirely, a Northern Hemisphere phenomenon. In the Southern Hemisphere, seasonal migration tends to be much less obvious. There are several reasons for this.

First, the largely uninterrupted expanses of land mass or ocean tend not to funnel migrations into narrow and obvious pathways, making them less obvious to the human observer. Second, at least for terrestrial birds, climatic regions tend to fade into one another over a long distance rather than be entirely separate: this means that rather than make long trips over unsuitable habitat to reach particular destinations, migrant species can usually travel at a relaxed pace, feeding as they go. Short of banding studies it is often not obvious that the birds seen in any particular locality as the seasons change are in fact different members of the same species passing through, gradually working their way north or south.

Many species do in fact breed in the temperate southern hemisphere regions and winter further north in the tropics. The southern African Greater Striped Swallow, and the Australian Satin Flycatcher, Dollarbird, and Rainbow Bee-eater for example, winters well north of their breeding range.

Physiology and control

The control of migration, its timing and response are genetically controlled and appear to be a primitive trait that is present even in non-migratory species of birds. The ability to navigate and orient themselves during migration is a much more complex phenomenon that may include both endogenous programs as well as learning.[20]

Timing

The primary physiological cue for migration are the changes in the day length. These changes are also related to hormonal changes in the birds.

In the period before migration, many birds display higher activity or Zugunruhe (German: migratory restlessness) as well as physiological changes such as increased fat deposition. The occurrence of Zugunruhe even in cage-raised birds with no environmental cues (e.g. shortening of day and falling temperature) has pointed to the role of circannual endogenous programs in controlling bird migrations. Caged birds display a preferential flight direction that corresponds with the migratory direction they would take in nature, even changing their preferential direction at roughly the same time their wild conspecifics change course.

In species where there is polygyny and with considerable sexual dimorphism, there is a tendency for males to return earlier to the breeding sites than their females. This is termed as protandry.[21][22]

Orientation and navigation

The routes of satellite tagged Bar-tailed Godwits migrating north from New Zealand. This species has the longest known non-stop migration of any species, up to 10,200 km (6,300 mi).

Navigation is based on a variety of senses. Many birds have been shown to use a sun compass. Using the sun for direction involves the need for making compensation based on the time. Navigation has also been shown to be based on a combination of other abilities including the ability to detect magnetic fields (magnetoception), use visual landmarks as well as olfactory cues.[23]

Long distance migrants are believed to disperse as young birds and form attachments to potential breeding sites and to favourite wintering sites. Once the site attachment is made they show high site-fidelity, visiting the same wintering sites year after year.[24]

The ability of birds to navigate during migrations cannot be fully explained by endogenous programming, even with the help of responses to environmental cues. The ability to successfully perform long-distance migrations can probably only be fully explained with an accounting for the cognitive ability of the birds to recognize habitats and form mental maps. Satellite tracking of day migrating raptors such as Ospreys and Honey Buzzards has shown that older individuals are better at making corrections for wind drift.[25]

As the circannual patterns indicate, there is a strong genetic component to migration in terms of timing and route, but this may be modified by environmental influences. An interesting example where a change of migration route has occurred because of such a geographical barrier is the trend for some Blackcaps in central Europe to migrate west and winter in Britain rather than cross the Alps.

Migratory birds may use two electromagnetic tools to find their destinations: one that is entirely innate and another that relies on experience. A young bird on its first migration flies in the correct direction according to the Earth's magnetic field, but does not know how far the journey will be. It does this through a radical pair mechanism whereby chemical reactions in special photo pigments sensitive to long wavelengths are affected by the field. Note that although this only works during daylight hours, it does not use the position of the sun in any way. At this stage the bird is similar to a boy scout with a compass but no map, until it grows accustomed to the journey and can put its other facilities to use. With experience they learn various landmarks and this "mapping" is done by magnetites in the trigeminal system, which tell the bird how strong the field is. Because birds migrate between northern and southern regions, the magnetic field strengths at different latitudes let it interpret the radical pair mechanism more accurately and let it know when it has reached its destination.[26] More recent research has found a neural connection between the eye and "Cluster N", the part of the forebrain that is active during migrational orientation, suggesting that birds may actually be able to see the magnetic field of the earth.[27][28]

Vagrancy

Migrating birds can lose their way and occur outside their normal ranges. These can be due to flying past their destinations as in the "spring overshoot" in which birds returning to their breeding areas overshoot and end up further north than intended. Reverse migration, where the genetic programming of young birds fails to work properly, can lead to great rarities turning up as vagrants thousands of kilometres out of range. Certain areas, because of their location, have become famous as watchpoints for migrating birds. Examples are the Point Pelee National Park in Canada, and Spurn in England. Drift migration of birds blown off course by the wind can result in "falls" of large numbers of migrants at coastal sites.

Migration conditioning

It has been possible to teach a migration route to a flock of birds, for example in re-introduction schemes. After a trial with Canada Geese, microlight aircraft were used in the US to teach safe migration routes to reintroduced Whooping Cranes.[29][30]

Adaptations

Birds need to alter their metabolism in order to meet the demands of migration. The storage of energy through the accumulation of fat and the control of sleep in nocturnal migrants require special physiological adaptations. In addition, the feathers of a bird suffer from wear-and-tear and require to be molted. The timing of this molt - usually once a year but sometimes two - varies with some species molting prior to moving to their winter grounds and others molting prior to returning to their breeding grounds.[31][32] Apart from physiological adaptations, migration sometimes requires behavioural changes such as flying in flocks to reduce the energy used in migration or the risk of predation.[33]

Evolutionary and ecological factors

Whether a particular species migrates depends on a number of factors. The climate of the breeding area is important, and few species can cope with the harsh winters of inland Canada or northern Eurasia. Thus the partially migratory Blackbird Turdus merula is migratory in Scandinavia, but not in the milder climate of southern Europe. The nature of the staple food is also significant. Most specialist insect eaters outside the tropics are long-distance migrants, and have little choice but to head south in winter.

Sometimes the factors are finely balanced. The Whinchat Saxicola rubetra of Europe and the Siberian Stonechat Saxicola maura of Asia are long-distance migrants wintering in the tropics, whereas their close relative, the European Stonechat Saxicola rubicola is a resident bird in most of its range, and moves only short distances from the colder north and east. A possible factor here is that the resident species can often raise an extra brood.

Recent research suggests that long-distance passerine migrants are of South American and African, rather than northern hemisphere, evolutionary origins. They are effectively southern species coming north to breed rather than northern species going south to winter.

Theoretical analyses, summarized by Alerstam (2001), show that detours that increase flight distance by up to 20% will often be adaptive on aerodynamic grounds - a bird that loads itself with food to cross a long barrier flies less efficiently. However some species show circuitous migratory routes that reflect historical range expansions and are far from optimal in ecological terms. An example is the migration of continental populations of Swainson's Thrush, which fly far east across North America before turning south via Florida to reach northern South America; this route is believed to be the consequence of a range expansion that occurred about 10,000 years ago. Detours may also be caused by differential wind conditions, predation risk, or other factors.

Climate change

Large scale climatic changes, as have been experienced in the past, are expected to have an effect on the timing of migration. Studies have shown a variety of effects including timing changes in migration, breeding[34] as well as population variations.[35][36]

Ecological effects

The migration of birds also aids the movement of other species, including those of ectoparasites such as ticks and lice,[37] which in turn may carry micro-organisms including those of concern to human health. Considerable interest has been taken due to the global spread of avian influenza, however migrant birds have not been found to be a special risk, with import of pet and domestic birds being a greater threat.[38] Some viruses that are maintained in birds without lethal effects, such as the West Nile Virus may however be spread by migrating birds.[39] Birds may also have a role in the dispersal of propagules of plants and plankton.[40][41]

Some predators take advantage of the concentration of birds during migration. Greater Noctule bats feed on nocturnal migrating passerines.[4] Some birds of prey specialize on migrating waders.[42]

Study techniques

Early studies on the timing of migration began in 1749 in Finland, with Johannes Leche of Turku collecting the dates of arrivals of spring migrants.[43]

Bird migration routes have been studied by a variety of techniques of which ringing is the oldest. Color marking and use of radar, satellite tracking are some of the other techniques.

Stable isotopes of hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, and sulphur have also been used to establish avian migratory connectivity between wintering sites and breeding grounds. Stable isotopic methods to establish migratory linkage rely on spatial isotopic differences in bird diet that are incorporated into inert tissues like feathers, or into growing tissues such as claws and muscle or blood.[44][45]

An approach to identify migration intensity makes use of upward pointing microphones to record the nocturnal contact calls of flocks flying overhead. These are then analyzed in a laboratory to measure time, frequency and species.[46]

Emlen funnel

An older technique to quantify migration involves observing the face of the moon towards full moon and counting the silhouettes of flocks of birds as they fly at night.[47][48]

Orientation behaviour studies have been traditionally carried out using variants of a setup known as the Emlen funnel, which consists of a circular cage with the top covered by glass or wire-screen so that either the sky is visible or the setup is placed in a planetarium or with other controls on environmental cues. The orientation behaviour of the bird inside the cage is studied quantitatively using the distribution of marks that the bird leaves on the walls of the cage.[49] Other approaches used in pigeon homing studies make use of the direction in which the bird vanishes on the horizon.

Threats and conservation

Human activities have threatened many migratory bird species.The distances involved in bird migration mean that they often cross political boundaries of countries and conservation measures require international cooperation. Several international treaties have been signed to protect migratory species including the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 of the US[50] and the African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbird Agreement.[51]

The concentration of birds during migration can put species at risk. Some spectacular migrants have already gone extinct, the most notable being the Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius). During migration the flocks were a mile (1.6 km) wide and 300 miles (500 km) long, taking several days to pass and containing up to a billion birds.

Other significant areas include stop-over sites between the wintering and breeding territories.[52] A capture-recapture study of passerine migrants with high fidelity for breeding and wintering sites did not show similar strict association with stop-over sites.[53]

Hunting along the migratory route can also take a heavy toll. The populations of Siberian Cranes that wintered in India declined due to hunting along the route, particularly in Afghanistan and Central Asia. Birds were last seen in their favourite wintering grounds in Keoladeo National Park in 2002.[54]

Structures such as power lines, wind farms and offshore oil-rigs have also been known to affect migratory birds.[55] Habitat destruction by land use changes is the biggest threat, and shallow wetlands that are stopover and wintering sites for migratory birds are particularly threatened by draining and reclamation for human use.

References

  1. Peter Berthold, Hans-Günther Bauer, Valerie Westhead (2001). Bird Migration: A General Survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198507879. 
  2. Sekercioglu, C.H. (2007). "Conservation ecology: area trumps mobility in fragment bird extinctions". Current Biology 17 (8): R283–R286. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.019. PMID 17437705. 
  3. Dondini, G., Vergari, S. (2000). "Carnivory in the greater noctule bat (Nyctalus lasiopterus) in Italy.". Journal of Zoology 251: 233–236. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00606.x. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Popa-Lisseanu, A. G., Delgado-Huertas, A., Forero, M. G., Rodriguez, A., Arlettaz, R. & Ibanez, C. (2007). "Bats' conquest of a formidable foraging niche: the myriads of nocturnally migrating songbirds.". PLoS ONE 2 (2): e205. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000205. PMID 17299585. 
  5. Ibáñez, C., Juste, J., García-Mudarra, J. L., Agirre-Mendi, P. T. (2001). "Bat predation on nocturnally migrating birds.". PNAS 98 (17): 9700–9702. doi:10.1073/pnas.171140598. PMID 11493689. PMC 55515. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/98/17/9700#B8. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Newton, I. (2008). The Migration Ecology of Birds.. Elselvier. ISBN 9780125173674. 
  7. Chan K (2001). "Partial migration in Australian landbirds: a review.". Emu 101 (4): 281–292. doi:10.1071/MU00034. 
  8. Boland, J. M. (1990). "Leapfrog migration in North American shorebirds: intra- and interspecific examples." (PDF). The Condor (The Condor, Vol. 92, No. 2) 92 (2): 284–290. doi:10.2307/1368226. http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v092n02/p0284-p0290.pdf. 
  9. Hummel, D. & Beukenberg, M. (1989). "Aerodynamische Interferenzeffekte beim Formationsfl ug von Vogeln", J. Ornithol. 130: 15–24.
  10. Cutts, C. J. & J R Speakman (1994). "Energy savings in formation flight of Pink-footed Geese." (PDF). J. Exp. Biol. 189 (1): 251–261. PMID 9317742. http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/189/1/251.pdf. 
  11. Geroudet, P. (1954). "Des oiseaux migrateurs trouvés sur la glacier de Khumbu dans l'Himalaya.". Nos Oiseaux 22: 254. 
  12. Swan, L. W. (1970). "Goose of the Himalayas.". Nat. Hist. 79 (10): 68–75. 
  13. Dorst, J. (1963). The migration of birds.. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston.. p. 476. 
  14. Eastwood, E. & G. C. Rider. (1965). "Some radar measurements of the altitude of bird flight.". British Birds 58: 393–426. 
  15. Williams, G. G. (1950). "Weather and spring migration.". Auk 67: 52–65. 
  16. 16.0 16.1 Lincoln, F. C. (1979). Migration of Birds.. Fish and Wildlife Service. Circular 16'.. http://www.archive.org/details/migrationofbirds00lincrich. 
  17. Gill, Robert E. Jr., Theunis Piersma, Gary Hufford, Rene Servranckx, Adrian Riegen (2005). "Crossing the ultimate ecological barrier: evidence for an 11,000 km-long nonstop flight from Alaska to New Zealand and Eastern Australia by Bar-tailed Godwits.". The Condor 107 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1650/7613. 
  18. Schmaljohann, Heiko, Felix Liechti and Bruno Bruderer (2007). "Songbird migration across the Sahara: the non-stop hypothesis rejected!". Proc Biol Sci. 274 (1610): 735–739. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0011. PMID 17254999. 
  19. Rattenborg, N.C., Mandt, B.H., Obermeyer, W.H., Winsauer, P.J., Huber, R. (2004). "Migratory Sleeplessness in the White-Crowned Sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii).". PLoS Biol. 2 (7): e212. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020212. PMID 15252455. 
  20. Helm B, Gwinner E (2006). "Migratory Restlessness in an Equatorial Nonmigratory Bird.". PLoS Biol. 4 (4): e110. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040110. PMID 16555925. 
  21. Diego Rubolini, Fernando Spina and Nicola Saino (2004). "Protandry and sexual dimorphism in trans-Saharan migratory birds.". Behavioral Ecology 15 (4): 592–601. doi:10.1093/beheco/arh048. http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/15/4/592. 
  22. Edwards, Darryl B.; Forbes, Mark R. (2007). "Absence of protandry in the spring migration of a population of Song Sparrows Melospiza melodia.". Ibis 149 (4): 715–720. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00692.x. 
  23. Walraff, H. G. (2005). Avian Navigation: Pigeon Homing as a Paradigm.. Springer. 
  24. Ketterson, E.D. and V. Nolan Jr. (1990). "Site attachment and site fidelity in migratory birds: experimental evidence from the field and analogies from neurobiology.". In E. Gwinner (PDF). Bird Migration.. Springer Verlag. pp. 117–129. http://www.indiana.edu/~kettlab/ellen/pubs/KettersonNolan1990.pdf. 
  25. Thorup, Kasper, Thomas Alerstam, Mikael Hake and Nils Kjelle (2003). "Compensation for wind drift in migrating raptors is age dependent.". Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.) 270: S8–S11. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0014. PMID 12952622. 
  26. Wiltschko, W., U. Munro, H. Ford & R. Wiltschko (2006). "Bird navigation: what type of information does the magnetite-based receiver provide?". Proc. R. Soc. B 273 (1603): 2815–20. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3651. PMID 17015316. 
  27. Heyers D, Manns M, Luksch H, Güntürkün O, Mouritsen H (2007). "A Visual Pathway Links Brain Structures Active during Magnetic Compass Orientation in Migratory Birds.". PLoS ONE 2 (9): e937. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000937. PMID 17895978. 
  28. Deutschlander, ME, Phillips, JB, Borland, SC (1999). "The case for light-dependent magnetic orientation in animals." (PDF). J.Exp. Biol. 202 (8): 891–908. http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/202/8/891. 
  29. "Operation migration". http://www.operationmigration.org/index.html. 
  30. "Whooping Crane Management Plan (Wisconsin)". http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/birds/wcrane/wcraneplan.htm. 
  31. Rohwer S; Butler LK & DR Froehlich (2005). "Ecology and Demography of East-West Differences in Molt Scheduling of Neotropical Migrant Passerines". In Greenberg R & Marra PP. Birds of two worlds: the ecology and evolution of migration. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 94. ISBN 0801881072. 
  32. Hedenström, A (2008). "Adaptations to migration in birds: behavioural strategies, morphology and scaling effects". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363 (1490): 287–299. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2140. PMID 17638691. 
  33. Weber, Jean-Michel (2009). "The physiology of long-distance migration: extending the limits of endurance metabolism". J. Exp. Biol. 212 (Pt 5): 593–597. doi:10.1242/jeb.015024. PMID 19218508. 
  34. Jenni L. & Kery M. (2003). "Timing of autumn bird migration under climate change: advances in long-distance migrants, delays in short-distance migrants.". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 1467. 
  35. Both, Christiaan; Sandra Bouwhuis, C. M. Lessells, Marcel E. Visser (2006-05-04). "Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird". Nature 441 (7089): 81–83. doi:10.1038/nature04539. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 16672969. 
  36. Wormworth, J. & K. Mallon (2006). Bird Species and Climate Change: The Global Status Report version 1.0.. WWF. http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/what_we_do/climate_change/problems/impacts/species/cc_and_birds/index.cfm. 
  37. Smith RP Jr, Rand PW, Lacombe EH, Morris SR, Holmes DW, Caporale DA (1996). "Role of bird migration in the long-distance dispersal of Ixodes dammini, the vector of Lyme disease.". J. Infect. Dis. (1): 221–4. 
  38. Rappole, J.H., Hubálek, Zdenek (2006). "Birds and Influenza H5N1 Virus Movement to and within North America.". Emerging Infectious Diseases 12: 10. http://hdl.handle.net/10088/875. 
  39. Rappole, J.H., Derrickson, S.R., Hubalek, Z. (2000). "Migratory Birds and Spread of West Nile Virus in the Western Hemisphere.". Emerging Infectious Diseases 6 (4): 319–328. doi:10.3201/eid0604.000401. PMID 10905964. PMC 2640881. http://hdl.handle.net/10088/364. 
  40. Figuerola, O. and A. J. Green (2002). "Dispersal of aquatic organisms by waterbirds: a review of past research and priorities for future studies.". Freshwater Biology 47 (3): 483–494. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00829.x. 
  41. Cruden, R. W. (1966). "Birds as Agents of Long-Distance Dispersal for Disjunct Plant Groups of the Temperate Western Hemisphere.". Evolution (Evolution, Vol. 20, No. 4) 20 (4): 517–532. doi:10.2307/2406587. http://jstor.org/stable/2406587. 
  42. Ronald C. Ydenberg, Robert W. Butler, David B. Lank, Barry D. Smith and John Ireland (2004). "Western sandpipers have altered migration tactics as peregrine falcon populations have recovered". Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271 (1545): 1263–1269 1263. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2713. PMID 15306350. PMC 1691718. http://www.sfu.ca/biology/wildberg/ydenbergetal2004PRSB.pdf. 
  43. Greenwood, Jeremy J. D. (2007). "Citizens, science and bird conservation". J. Ornithol . 148 (Suppl 1): S77–S124. doi:10.1007/s10336-007-0239-9. 
  44. Keith Hobson, Leonard Wassenaar (1997). "Linking breeding and wintering grounds of neotropical migrant songbirds using stable hydrogen isotopic analysis of feathers". Oecologia 109: 142–148. doi:10.1007/s004420050068. 
  45. Gabriel Bowen, Leonard Wassenaar, Keith Hobson (2005). "Global application of stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes to wildlife forensics". Oecologia 143 (3): 337–348. doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1813-y. PMID 15726429. 
  46. Farnsworth, A., Gauthreaux, S.A., and van Blaricom, D. (2004). "A comparison of nocturnal call counts of migrating birds and reflectivity measurements on Doppler radar." (PDF). Journal of Avian Biology 35: 365–369. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03180.x. http://www.andrewfarnsworth.com/PDFs/JAB3180.pdf. 
  47. Liechti, F. (1996). Instructions to count nocturnal bird migration by watching the full moon.. Schweizerische Vogelwarte, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland. 
  48. Lowery, G.H. (1951). "A quantitative study of the nocturnal migration of birds.". University Kan. Pub. Mus. Nat. Hist. 3: 361–472. 
  49. Emlen, S. T. and Emlen, J. T. (1966). "A technique for recording migratory orientation of captive birds.". Auk 83: 361–367. 
  50. "Migratory bird Treaty 16 USC 703-711; 40 Stat. 755". http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/16/ch7.html. 
  51. "African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbird Agreement". http://www.unep-aewa.org/documents/index.htm. 
  52. Shimazaki, Hiroto; Masayuki Tamura and Hiroyoshi Higuchi (2004). "Migration routes and important stopover sites of endangered oriental white storks (Ciconia boyciana) as revealed by satellite tracking. Mem." (PDF). Natl Inst. Polar Res., Spec. Issue 58: 162–178. http://www.nipr.ac.jp/~penguin/oogataHP/pdfarticles/16p162-178.pdf. 
  53. Catry, P., Encarnacao, V., Araujo, A., Fearon, P., Fearon, A., Armelin, M. & Delaloye, P. (2004). "Are long-distance migrant passerines faithful to their stopover sites?". Journal of Avian Biology 35: 170–181. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03112.x. 
  54. "Siberian Crane fact sheet". http://www.savingcranes.org/species/siberian.cfm. 
  55. "Fish and Wildlife Service- Bird Mortality Fact sheet" (PDF). http://www.fws.gov/birds/mortality-fact-sheet.pdf. 

Further reading

External links